Cultural Marxism (or National Socialism): Dehumanize and Rule
One unseen consequence of the totalitarianism enforced by ultra radical political views in the German society and culture to date, has been the dehumanization of the people through very subtle forms of mind control, such as the social control of the masses through the manipulation of their individual sexual behavior.
In the image posted below, that circulated in 2013 thorugh the social networks (it is hard to tell if the nacked bodies have been Photoshoped, but for the sake of this presentation the images have been censored), the viewers see a young not yet Chancellor Angela Merkel, posing nude in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), where she grew up.
The idea of the Freie Koerper Kultur (FKK or Free Body Culture) in the German Democratic Republic (GDR) was to make believe that the human bodies are equal: No shame would be implied, nudity should be seen as a natural form of social indoctrination where no one should feel ashamed.
The GDR acquired the nudity emphasis from its previous ruling elite: The Nazis declared that the human body of the Master Race was the highest aesthetic ideal to be found in human anatomy, and they brainwashed the society and culture to overcome modesty and chastity, towards a sexist lifestyle that was actually supported and indoctrinated by the dictatorial state. Such a coercive form of sexual mass "education" was enforced as to alienate the individual from the freedom to say NO in the presence of state-managed promiscuity.
Seen from the historical perspective, the GDR didn't have too many problems subjecting its population to the social nudity training, because they all came from the Nazi education that had already declared the human bodies of the Master-race a property of Germany. When the GDR took over, again whole masses of the German Folk followed unquestioning.
Manipulation of mass secuality, as an effective form of social control, happened in the GDR under the dictate of the STASI, in a totalitarian socialist culture and society that did not support Individual Freedom and that actually was as indoctrinating as the National Socialism. From National Socialism to Social Realism only a change of labels had to happen.
Dissent wouldn't be an option in the GDR, as it wasn't an option in the Third Reich. In both histories, the state passed into law the mass control regulations of the peoples' sexuality under the label of "Freedom" ("Umwertung der Werte": The social values were revaluated by an elite, and then passed on as impositions to be obeyed by the collective).
There is a wrong perception suggesting that the sexual control was only enforced by the cultural Marxism that came from Eastern Germany. But, the sexual control of the people was not only present in the society of the GDR. During Nazi Germany, the public sexuality had also been manipulated by the state in various instances, such as:
The institution of the Lebensborn, the German genetic state-based mass procreation of babies, was conceived in its totallity by the state and for the state: The Germanic women were utilized as reproduction vessels to multiply the Master Race not only in Germany, but their sexual abuses against the women of Europe went through up to Norway and Poland, where innumerable babies were generated under the most despicable promiscuity, no marital love involved, for the sake of the German ideology.
In cases regarding the minorities, those who were excluded by the mainstream would also be striped, nudity pictures were shot to reach incredible forms of dehumanization. The human body was seen as a property of the state, their clothes stripped in all cases —to be sold. Golden teeth would also produce assets to the state. Even human skin would be utilized by the state under its legal standards, to produce commodity items, like lamp screens, gloves, shoes...
Above: Children starved to death. Nude photographed in Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz.
The persisting habit of stripping people publicly is visible at all instances of the German historical conundrum, throughout the Nazi and the Communist historical periods.
Albeit the FKK movement in the GDR would be depicted as a peaceful regulation intending to demistify the human body, it also could be understood as part of a social psychiatric manipulation for mass control, that aims to reform the thoughts of the collective and thus manipulate the culture for the control of the public's paralyzed minds into fearful obedience.
The problem is not only born in the GDR, but the persistence of photographing nude people during the Nazi rule can be seen as part of the same obsession with intruding in the individual's intimacy to reformat the person's mind and identity by stripping the human being from very intimate personal, psychological, moral and ethical codes, that are fundamental parts in the stable development of human individuality.
The following excerpt from a film shows how nudity was an enforced practice that reduced the collective will to its worthless nothingness during the Nazi rule:
Once the person's sexual identity has been taken over by the overt or covert violence of a criminal state, the individual is doomed to obey and to subject one's personal will, material and intellectual property to the dictatorial obsession. The problem is, the individual's vision and freedom become circumvented by the state and are then limited in what becomes a coercive environment that compulsively demands one's assimilation.
The above should explain the lack of responses that come from the German people when they face oppression or state corruption, even to this day. The culture has been deeply trained to obey and to remain silent through the intensive intrusion of the state in the individual's intimacy during the Nazi rule, during the GDR Communist dictatorship and at its present time.
Recently, a German professor, born and raised in South America, shared a thesis that explains the German reality of today as a continuum that started before Germany was split in the two Eastern and Western parts:
The German DEMOCRATIC Republic existed, as its name explains, under a clear acumen between the Communist Party and the ex-Nazis, who had agreed to pact for their coexistence with the Communist Party. The GDR did not call it, the "Nazi" Party, but it was a clear perpetuation of the old tradition and culture. It is quite difficult to separate two sides of a history that did not really split. To the question, how does the social-psychiatric development of mass control through the manipulation of the peoples' sexuality arrived to Western Germany, if it started in the GDR? The researcher explains that the trend could have been infiltrated in the West, through the influences of Cultural Marxism that were broadcast by most of the media and German teachers/professors in the educational institutions of the post war period. Teachers and professors had been well instructed in the Marxist ideology, that they received through the public "pedagogic education."
But, the quote above omits the presence of sexual control already in the Nazi time. The fact that the German Nazi and Lebensborn sexual promiscuity originated in the GDR remains unexplained in the above quotation, where the reader misses the recognition of the harms and damages that the Lebensborn caused on the German population at large. Lebensborn was not originated in the GDR, but it was institutionalized by the Nazis before the GDR was formed. But, the quote seems to correctly identify the total lack of conflict on the factual transfer of the sexual ideologies that have ruled Germany from the Nazi, through the Communist, into the present reality of Reunified Germany.
As seen through these insights into the sexual control exerted on the German people from Lebensborn well into the Communist and present time, the German culture has fallen to rogue materialism and a complete form of dehumanization in which the individual may not always be aware that he/she is still being manipulated by the state, to act in a particular sexual form.
It seems like that the permanently neurotic reaction for nudity and promiscuity is all that may still be found through the German search for The Overman. In such a complicated brainwashed scenario, is there any room left for the individual's quest of Liberty? How can a bird that was born and raised in captivity know the right way out into freedom? How can the captive bird/mind know freedom, by looking at reality from inside the fabricated box?